P aul Sax is an infectious-disease physician and professor at Harvard Medical School. Even so, when Sax's kids asked him whether they should get the updated COVID vaccine this fall, he wasn't really sure what to tell them. His two children are in their 20s, healthy, and at no special risk of complications from disease. Each had recovered from COVID, and thus, he reasoned, had extra immunity on top of what they'd gotten from their prior shots. Another injection would likely cause them a day or two of unpleasant side effects, and expose them to a very small risk of heart inflammation . Would it also meaningfully lower their chances of infection or the severity of their symptoms if they did get sick? Would an extra shot reduce their minuscule odds of death? Sax admits he didn't have "iron-clad data" to back up his thinking either way. The bivalent vaccines had been authorized only on the basis of how many antibodies they produced, a useful but imperfect gauge of their positive effects—and so, even now, no one knows for sure how much real-world benefit they provide for the majority of Americans who are already shielded by vaccination and prior infection…. Read full this story
- Boston, Philadelphia, and San Francisco Top Life Science Cities in US
- Now Is the Time to Move to Cloud-based Research Informatics
- First Direct Observation and Measurement of Ultra-Fast Moving Vortices in Superconductors
- How science fiction could get climate change right
- Science, Business, and Controversy Are Keynotes
- Researchers Move Toward MRSA Vaccine
- Moving Past Neodymium: Scientists Explore Alternative to Expensive Rare Earth Element
- Analysis: PS2 Emulation on PS4, PS Now and Xbox One Backwards Compatibility
- Top 10 Original Xbox Games We Want for Backward Compatibility
- Xbox One Backward Compatibility Now Supports Multi-Disc Games
COVID Science Is Moving Backwards have 296 words, post on www.theatlantic.com at December 7, 2022. This is cached page on Bach Thien. If you want remove this page, please contact us.